We could have spent this money and labor on decarbonization, and our failure to do so will have vast, multi-generational consequences.
The effort to drive carbon emissions to 0 continues in earnest, but climate chaos is already here, and at this rate it’s going to get much worse before we finally take this problem seriously.
direwolf20 36 minutes ago [-]
We couldn't, because we don't have it. They have it. We gave it to them and let them keep it.
nine_zeros 26 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
ksec 5 hours ago [-]
One of the them is a one shot project and one of them is an infrastructure project being used by billions. It makes a nice headline but not a decent comparison.
On another note I wish there is some break down of where all the spendings goes to. GPU, CPU, RAM, Network, Switch, Cables, Power, Datacenter. The AI ecosystem and business is larger than Smartphone revolution kick started by Apple, but unlike Smartphone or consumer products these Hyperscaler and AI spending right now it is very opaque.
trescenzi 4 hours ago [-]
The moon landing led to a huge amount of infrastructure and inventions which now power the modern world. The moon landing was the marketing moment. The buildout of space tech and creation of industry was the actual goal.
somewhereoutth 4 hours ago [-]
specifically to keep up with the Soviet Union. Sputnik 'concentrated a lot of minds' as they say.
zug_zug 4 hours ago [-]
Well… maybe making thinking machines mass produced is actually a more amazing project than the moon landing
Just need to make sure the wealth is spread equally
mbgerring 37 minutes ago [-]
The wealth will not be spread equally. The way we’re building all of this infrastructure is designed to prevent that.
JKCalhoun 2 hours ago [-]
> Well… maybe making thinking machines mass produced…
Now if we could only make thinking machines. ;-)
(Kind of surprised at all the negging of moon landings in this thread. Maybe I'm just of an older generation. At least one other post here points out all the spinoffs in regard to integrated circuits, etc. that came from the previous apace race.)
dyauspitr 1 hours ago [-]
Spoiler alert: The wealth will not be spread equally until there is violence to demand it and that’s not going to happen because the “overlords” will make sure people have just enough to get by.
To be fair, I don’t think distributing wealth equally even makes sense but we should definitely aim for distributing wealth in a way that most people can get through life with all their basic needs comfortably met.
ratatatatata 1 hours ago [-]
[dead]
fennecbutt 33 minutes ago [-]
Yeah but wasn't the moon landing funded by hard cash?
AI stuff (and tbh all silicon valley tech companies even outside AI) all seem to be funded by the theoretical valuation of various companies and barely any of it is hard cash. All stock deals and dog food.
mock-possum 2 hours ago [-]
Okay but I can actually use AI, whereas I’ve only seen pictures someone else going to the moon.
Also the US and the Soviet Union raced to get to the moon first, but the whole internet-connected world gets LLMs right now.
xhkkffbf 3 hours ago [-]
The moon landing was cool, but all we got were some neat imagery and some rocks. And we've even managed to lose some of the rocks because they were that special. At least with the AIs, we're getting something.
The effort to drive carbon emissions to 0 continues in earnest, but climate chaos is already here, and at this rate it’s going to get much worse before we finally take this problem seriously.
On another note I wish there is some break down of where all the spendings goes to. GPU, CPU, RAM, Network, Switch, Cables, Power, Datacenter. The AI ecosystem and business is larger than Smartphone revolution kick started by Apple, but unlike Smartphone or consumer products these Hyperscaler and AI spending right now it is very opaque.
Just need to make sure the wealth is spread equally
Now if we could only make thinking machines. ;-)
(Kind of surprised at all the negging of moon landings in this thread. Maybe I'm just of an older generation. At least one other post here points out all the spinoffs in regard to integrated circuits, etc. that came from the previous apace race.)
To be fair, I don’t think distributing wealth equally even makes sense but we should definitely aim for distributing wealth in a way that most people can get through life with all their basic needs comfortably met.
AI stuff (and tbh all silicon valley tech companies even outside AI) all seem to be funded by the theoretical valuation of various companies and barely any of it is hard cash. All stock deals and dog food.
Also the US and the Soviet Union raced to get to the moon first, but the whole internet-connected world gets LLMs right now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_and_missing_Moon_rocks.