NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
Lidar waveforms are worth 40x128x33 words (openaccess.thecvf.com)
stavros 1 days ago [-]
168,960
amarant 23 hours ago [-]
Clearly 10,813,440. Gotta factor the words!
brcmthrowaway 1 days ago [-]
Can lidar be purchased for hobbyist use yet?
generuso 22 hours ago [-]
Sure. Line scan indoor units are extremely affordable, and some cost less that $20, sold as spare parts for robot vacuum cleaners. Outdoor units (with higher ambient light tolerance and longer range) are an order of magnitude more expensive, but also available.

Here is some detailed information about low cost units: https://github.com/kaiaai/awesome-2d-lidars/blob/main/README...

frozeus 1 days ago [-]
Depends on your budget and the resolution you need.

E.g Livox mid 360 https://store.dji.com/en/product/livox-mid-360

froglets 24 hours ago [-]
I haven’t done it myself but I’ve heard of people harvesting LiDAR units from their old/broken robot vacuums.
ImPostingOnHN 1 days ago [-]
Check out PiLIDAR for one of many options:

https://github.com/PiLiDAR/PiLiDAR

ck2 1 days ago [-]
BTW with self-driving cars, what happens when there are hundreds of Lidar signals at one intersection?

There's no way a sensor can tell if a signal was from its own origin?

Guessing any signal should be treated as untrusted until verified somehow

but I suspect coders won't be doing that unless it's easy

retrac 20 hours ago [-]
> There's no way a sensor can tell if a signal was from its own origin?

https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ntc.....2...18F/abstra...

https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA218226.pdf

> An increasingly popular modulation scheme is Binary Pseudo Random Phase Coding (BPRPC), whereby the phase of the transmitted signal is switched between 0 and 180 under the control of a binary pseudo random sequence

this applies straightforwardly to lidar

basically: optical CDMA or DSSS

spoofing replay may still be a concern

r2_pilot 1 days ago [-]
Typically you use a pulse train and filter your train from the noise
Rarebox 1 days ago [-]
If one lidar hits another, it will result in at most one bad reading (perhaps a bad column?). This can likely be filtered, or a bad scan (360deg) can be altogether rejected and the data predicted using models based on past sensor readings.
jowday 22 hours ago [-]
Worked adjacent to the AV space 5~ years ago. This wasn’t my area but I remember learning that this was a robustly solved problem long ago.
MengerSponge 1 days ago [-]
I guess phase and timing sensitivity help a lot, because it's unlikely that another emitter will perfectly match your emission/detection duty cycle. It's also hard to get hundreds of cars at one intersection, because cars are very big.

The key terms in your literature/patent search should probably be "Crosstalk" and "multi-LIDaR".

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 23:09:12 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.