NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
▲Butterflies use optical illusions to dodge predators (essex.ac.uk)
lopis 16 hours ago [-]
I don't understand articles that are completely about a piece of media, but don't show or link to any piece of said media. This article cannot be effective without a video.
joombaga 7 hours ago [-]
Agreed. Dr. Troscianko posted a video on YouTube. https://youtu.be/joosKZ3HygE?t=316

Also the paper is easy to read and has illustrations. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-11062-w

Utilera 15 hours ago [-]
Even a 10-second slow-motion clip would probably explain the result better than half the article
properbrew 9 hours ago [-]
> “The first slow-motion video of a butterfly I put through our bird-vision computer model was glowing with downwards motion even though the butterfly was moving up.

Yep, really would have loved to see that video. Why mention it and not link to it.

Utilera 15 hours ago [-]
What I like about this is that the camouflage isn't really in the pattern itself, but in the interaction between the pattern, the wing deformation, and the predator's visual system.
scun 22 hours ago [-]
Sounds like the ol' razzle dazzle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazzle_camouflage

schiffern 13 hours ago [-]
Is this (in effect) "flood the zone" for certain targeted information theoretic chokepoints within the visual processing system? Similar to false cockpits on planes, you're adversarially and intentionally creating additional visual processing work?

PS, still a great musical...

SaintGhurka 10 hours ago [-]
A rabbit's high-contrast cottontail serves a similar purpose.

Predators focus on the tail but as the body turns, the tail very briefly appears to continue in the same direction or momentarily disappears. The predator is forced to constantly refocus, creating lots of opportunities for them to make a mistake.

yathern 22 hours ago [-]
> The team combined multiple lines of evidence. They used a high-speed camera to film real butterflies taking off at over 1,000 frames per second to capture how their patterns behave in flight, as seen through the eyes of a bird.

> To test how patterns affected real attacks, 100 volunteers acted as “predators”, trying to catch virtual butterflies on a touchscreen.

This sounds fascinating, and I'd love to see footage demonstrating the barber-pole effect. If that's not available, I'd alternatively love to see footage of volunteers trying to tap butterflies on an iPad.

Utilera 15 hours ago [-]
The description is interesting enough that it almost feels incomplete without the video
isolay 16 hours ago [-]
Well, what the kids don’t learn in biology class, they can still learn on HN.
esalman 18 hours ago [-]
This weekend while cleaning dry leaves in our backyard we discovered a large moth. We all mistook it fot another dry leaf until it started fluttering. Fabulous stuff.
aeternum 6 hours ago [-]
Quite the assertion with zero evidence nor competing theories provided or quoted
goodmachine 5 hours ago [-]
The paper provides four classes of evidence for one theory lacking any.
aeternum 4 hours ago [-]
There's no paper cited
anon48293 8 hours ago [-]
> “To test how patterns affected real attacks, 100 volunteers acted as “predators”, trying to catch virtual butterflies on a touchscreen.”

I’d love to play this game

anthk 22 hours ago [-]
This is Micheal Levin-level mind blowing. His theory can be shortened to "there's intelligence in really small discrete parts of Biological entities".
teekert 7 hours ago [-]
Trait forms by chance, trait confers advantage, next generation has more individuals with trait. No intelligence needed to climb mount improbably, just massive parallel trial and error and selection.
suddenlybananas 13 hours ago [-]
How is that different from just saying "evolutionary adaptive changes can seem clever".
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 22:34:32 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.