It's interesting in retrospect that the keyboard of the first Macintosh was a very deliberate 60% layout, given how popular that size has become over the past 15 years among enthusiasts (albeit now augmented by fully customizable secondary layers so arrow keys/etc are still possible).
written-beyond 14 hours ago [-]
This is the first time, in my entire life I have experienced a website overriding pinch to zoom. I couldn't pinch to zoom, just on top of pictures, which would expand the image then zoom into it.
Why would the author do that, very frustrating.
shlewis 5 hours ago [-]
Quite a lot of websites do that, actually. That's why Firefox Android has _always allow zoom_ toggle under accessibility.
ig-88ms 12 hours ago [-]
Works for me on Android with Firefox
written-beyond 12 hours ago [-]
It doesn't on windows FF
KaseKun 21 hours ago [-]
loved it!
malfist 19 hours ago [-]
I'm sorry, but it doesn't matter what IBM did in the 70s and 80s with keyboards, if shift+2 changes the zoom for everyone but a windows user using the number pad, thats a bug. Its a violated expedition and different between OSes.
Also, what is this writing style. Every sentence is numbered with options to tweet it, horizontal lines between each with huge amounts of padding and one to two images between each sentence. Is this even meant to be read by humans?
kamiheku 19 hours ago [-]
> Also, what is this writing style. Every sentence is numbered with options to tweet it [...]
It's an archived copy of a Twitter thread, as it states in the first paragraph.
mjdiloreto 16 hours ago [-]
Except the windows user did not hit shift+2 they hit shift+down_arrow, as it states in the thread.
Rendered at 08:50:51 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Why would the author do that, very frustrating.
Also, what is this writing style. Every sentence is numbered with options to tweet it, horizontal lines between each with huge amounts of padding and one to two images between each sentence. Is this even meant to be read by humans?
It's an archived copy of a Twitter thread, as it states in the first paragraph.