NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
▲ElementaryUI – Swift, in the Browser (elementary.codes)
adrusi 11 hours ago [-]
Reminiscent of the now 18-year-old Cappuccino project https://www.cappuccino.dev/
frizlab 10 hours ago [-]
Project that is still alive, amazingly.
jdminhbg 5 hours ago [-]
The last release and blog post are from 2018, is it actually alive?
joelkesler 4 hours ago [-]
Yep! If you look at the GitHub repo, there is commits added in the last 5 days:

https://github.com/cappuccino/cappuccino/commits/main/

thejazzman 5 hours ago [-]
> Latest Version: 1.0.0 (September 4 2018)
sapphire4 9 hours ago [-]
The web version of Keynote with it was amazing.
indstinctdialog 7 hours ago [-]
Objective-J is something I entirely forgot existed.
sampton 10 hours ago [-]
I paid $20 for their interface builder and never got it.
pipeline_peak 11 hours ago [-]
I’d say this is closer to Blazor
gosen 2 hours ago [-]
It would be interesting to see any benchmarks / comparisons to understand what are the benefits of having Swift in the browser. Is it faster? Easier to maintain? Or is it based more on the sympathy to the programming language in general?

But great job anyway!

pjmlp 1 hours ago [-]
Bit by bit, we are having our beloved browser plugins back, at least for some of us.
brailsafe 8 hours ago [-]
Looks a bit like jQuery mixed with jsx and ember or angular
beans6543 12 hours ago [-]
Their demo is flakey and sometimes fails to hydrate in Firefox latest
jan_m_savage 8 hours ago [-]
sooner or later this was gonna happen. Swift is like Haskell, but nicer and more programmer-friendly.
isodev 2 hours ago [-]
I wouldn’t fly so close to Apple if I have the choice. Apple could pivot at any moment - “New versions of Swift start at $99,99” /s
earthnail 11 minutes ago [-]
New versions of Swift are truly cross-platform. We support iOS, iPadOS, MacOS, HomeOS, VisionOS, WatchOS as well as BodyOS, BrainOS and iThinkOS.

To help developers focus on the future, Swift 9 drops support for deprecated platforms such as Linux, Windows and the web.

/s

I'm actually a Swift developer; it's a great language, but I'm also married to the Apple ecosystem and wouldn't choose it outside of it.

maxdo 10 hours ago [-]
Any reason/motivation why ?
simonleeb 8 minutes ago [-]
ElementaryUI author here.

The honest original motivation was mostly "Swift for websites, can I do it?". But underneath, I really want to use one capable and modern language (+ ecosystem and tooling) for all my dev needs. That includes having a native, "in-ecosystem" solution for creating web apps of any kind. Somebody's gotta build it...

I recently wrote a bit about that on the swift.org blog: https://www.swift.org/blog/whats-new-in-swift-august-2026/

kamisori-daijin 11 hours ago [-]
Nice!
MichaelTestGrid 1 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
pipeline_peak 11 hours ago [-]
We already have Typescript, I don’t see the purpose.
frizlab 10 hours ago [-]
‘cause Swift is great, I guess! And more seriously, probably for a shared logic with an iOS & android app.
alsetmusic 9 hours ago [-]
Just wait until they rewrite Swift with Rust.
monster_truck 8 hours ago [-]
I'd rather use Slopjective-C 3.0 tbh
astafrig 8 hours ago [-]
This sentiment is sorely missing from the endless Rust re-writes.
vips7L 2 hours ago [-]
Typescript isn’t that good of a language.
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 09:54:05 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.